<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for High Def Edition - HD Video, DSLR Filmmaking, Cinematography and Photography</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.highdefedition.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.highdefedition.com</link>
	<description>HD Video, Photography, Video camera&#039;s, DSLR Film making and Post Production - By Christian Fitzpatrick.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 04:25:44 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on The 2009 Coolum Kite Festival by Gem Lewis</title>
		<link>http://www.highdefedition.com/2009/10/the-2009-coolum-kite-festival/comment-page-1/#comment-303</link>
		<dc:creator>Gem Lewis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 04:25:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.highdefedition.com/?p=249#comment-303</guid>
		<description>Hello Christian,  I tried to use the link to view the footage of the Kite Festival again.  You may have read in local Sunshine Coast papers that we are seeking a new event manager for the Coolum Kite Festival due to current long term organisers burnout. As mentioned previously, I think your clip would be a great tool to assist with sponsorship for the future of the festival.  Would love to discuss with you further.  I can be contacted at info@coolumkitefestival.com
Cheers
Gem</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Christian,  I tried to use the link to view the footage of the Kite Festival again.  You may have read in local Sunshine Coast papers that we are seeking a new event manager for the Coolum Kite Festival due to current long term organisers burnout. As mentioned previously, I think your clip would be a great tool to assist with sponsorship for the future of the festival.  Would love to discuss with you further.  I can be contacted at <a href="mailto:info@coolumkitefestival.com">info@coolumkitefestival.com</a><br />
Cheers<br />
Gem</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Riders on the Storm on the 7D by Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.highdefedition.com/2010/02/riders-on-the-storm-on-the-7d/comment-page-1/#comment-302</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 14:07:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.highdefedition.com/?p=404#comment-302</guid>
		<description>Can you use the slide for a vertical track/jib shot?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can you use the slide for a vertical track/jib shot?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The 2009 Coolum Kite Festival by Christian</title>
		<link>http://www.highdefedition.com/2009/10/the-2009-coolum-kite-festival/comment-page-1/#comment-301</link>
		<dc:creator>Christian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 23:12:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.highdefedition.com/?p=249#comment-301</guid>
		<description>Hey Tim!

I know who you are mate! I&#039;ve been a big fan of your work ever since being blown away by Blackwater a few years back. That was a sick flick bro!

Ok, so I went with a 7D over a 5D, for a couple of reasons. Firstly, the frame rates of the 7D (25P and slo-mo in 720P was a real drawcard. I used to shoot alot of sports an brought the HVX specifically for it&#039;s overcranking ability), secondly, the fact it was $1000 cheaper and at that time, it seemed like a much better camera for the money. I really didn&#039;t need a full frame sensor for low light performance and that extra bit of bokeh. So far I have been very happy with my choice. Sure I&#039;ll go full frame one day, but for now, I&#039;m happy. Oh and it&#039;s also pretty nice to put a 400mm lens on and have it turn into a 640mm lens! The crop factor is cool :)

I have no idea what settings I used on this video, it was so long ago. . .I have been asked this alot and really I don&#039;t have a secret sauce as such. . .I just shoot whatever looks good on the day, using the default picture profiles and tweaking all the settings until I get something I am pleased with.

I do know that for interviews I usually shoot in Portait or Faithful, simply because it doesn&#039;t make people look to orange.

Thanks for stopping by Tim. If you&#039;re ever heading up this way, just holler, it&#039;d be great to catch up over a few beers. :)

Christian</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Tim!</p>
<p>I know who you are mate! I&#8217;ve been a big fan of your work ever since being blown away by Blackwater a few years back. That was a sick flick bro!</p>
<p>Ok, so I went with a 7D over a 5D, for a couple of reasons. Firstly, the frame rates of the 7D (25P and slo-mo in 720P was a real drawcard. I used to shoot alot of sports an brought the HVX specifically for it&#8217;s overcranking ability), secondly, the fact it was $1000 cheaper and at that time, it seemed like a much better camera for the money. I really didn&#8217;t need a full frame sensor for low light performance and that extra bit of bokeh. So far I have been very happy with my choice. Sure I&#8217;ll go full frame one day, but for now, I&#8217;m happy. Oh and it&#8217;s also pretty nice to put a 400mm lens on and have it turn into a 640mm lens! The crop factor is cool <img src='http://www.highdefedition.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I have no idea what settings I used on this video, it was so long ago. . .I have been asked this alot and really I don&#8217;t have a secret sauce as such. . .I just shoot whatever looks good on the day, using the default picture profiles and tweaking all the settings until I get something I am pleased with.</p>
<p>I do know that for interviews I usually shoot in Portait or Faithful, simply because it doesn&#8217;t make people look to orange.</p>
<p>Thanks for stopping by Tim. If you&#8217;re ever heading up this way, just holler, it&#8217;d be great to catch up over a few beers. <img src='http://www.highdefedition.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Christian</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Canon 7D Autofocus Issue by Richard</title>
		<link>http://www.highdefedition.com/2009/10/canon-7d-autofocus-issue/comment-page-1/#comment-300</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 06:27:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.highdefedition.com/?p=268#comment-300</guid>
		<description>This is second 7D camera I am sending back. The first one was totally whack. No focus to find anywhere on the picture,in manual focus, so after long and painful trying everything I could, I’ve returned it to the B&amp;H for a replacement. This one is a better than the first one, may be that why it took so long for me to send it back . I’m still unhappy with the focus; picture quality is soft and fuzzy plus on top of that muddy. The grain seems to be very large sometimes even on 400 ISO, it looks like a gain is turn on. So, with all of this combined in one picture is not acceptable for a DSLR. For example, compare between Canon 7D with L lens with my wife’s Lumix compact camera. It is embarrassment that’s all. On top of everything, I recently found several burned pixels in a brand new camera???....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is second 7D camera I am sending back. The first one was totally whack. No focus to find anywhere on the picture,in manual focus, so after long and painful trying everything I could, I’ve returned it to the B&amp;H for a replacement. This one is a better than the first one, may be that why it took so long for me to send it back . I’m still unhappy with the focus; picture quality is soft and fuzzy plus on top of that muddy. The grain seems to be very large sometimes even on 400 ISO, it looks like a gain is turn on. So, with all of this combined in one picture is not acceptable for a DSLR. For example, compare between Canon 7D with L lens with my wife’s Lumix compact camera. It is embarrassment that’s all. On top of everything, I recently found several burned pixels in a brand new camera???&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Canon 7D Autofocus Issue by Lestat</title>
		<link>http://www.highdefedition.com/2009/10/canon-7d-autofocus-issue/comment-page-1/#comment-299</link>
		<dc:creator>Lestat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 03:48:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.highdefedition.com/?p=268#comment-299</guid>
		<description>i would urge anyone with what they feel are focusing issues to call canon and just tell them you have focusing issues and you want to send it in for repair.

there is ALOT of talk about this issue, and this is an issue reported by pro&#039;s and weekend photographers such as myself.
this is not a lens, or handheld shot issue.
this is a direct camera focusing system issue.

several people have reported that upon receiving their camera back the canon repair form stated that the focusing system was replaced or adjusted.
this beyond a doubt shows that there is fault in the camera, or atleast those that were sent in.

i can tell you I have tested over 1000 pictures for focus and can confirm without a shadow of a doubt that there are 100 different variables of whats causing the focusing issues and that none of which are human error.
as i mentioned above, different canon styles (which directly change the contrast from style to style) effect the focus, different lenses focus differently, different lighting, contrast, colors, all make the same lens focus different.
also the different AF points in the view finder will focus differently too.

focus on one thing, take the shot, then change the focus point in the camera, say from center to center right, or far right center, move the camera so that it is focused on the same thing as your first shot, take the shot... what happened?
for me, the focusing was worse the further i moved away from the center point. and i am not talking 1cm, i am talking completely and utterly out of focus.

i have sent mine into New Jersey canon repair and am awaiting the results.

I also sent in my 85mm F/1.8 and 50mm F/1.8 to have them tested on my camera so they can see the issue and also test the lenses for focus calibration.

the new focusing system is new, yes and not the same as the old cameras, but its not so advanced that one lens shoudl work 100% fine on, say a 40D and then not work on the 7D. and we are not talking one lense, we are talking atleast 6 lenses that work on one camera but not on the 7D. (for me)

my original 7D was fine until i mounted the 85mm F/1.8 so i fear it may be an issue with the lens that, electronically, might be hurting the camera. so again, another reason why i sent the lenses in with the camera.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i would urge anyone with what they feel are focusing issues to call canon and just tell them you have focusing issues and you want to send it in for repair.</p>
<p>there is ALOT of talk about this issue, and this is an issue reported by pro&#8217;s and weekend photographers such as myself.<br />
this is not a lens, or handheld shot issue.<br />
this is a direct camera focusing system issue.</p>
<p>several people have reported that upon receiving their camera back the canon repair form stated that the focusing system was replaced or adjusted.<br />
this beyond a doubt shows that there is fault in the camera, or atleast those that were sent in.</p>
<p>i can tell you I have tested over 1000 pictures for focus and can confirm without a shadow of a doubt that there are 100 different variables of whats causing the focusing issues and that none of which are human error.<br />
as i mentioned above, different canon styles (which directly change the contrast from style to style) effect the focus, different lenses focus differently, different lighting, contrast, colors, all make the same lens focus different.<br />
also the different AF points in the view finder will focus differently too.</p>
<p>focus on one thing, take the shot, then change the focus point in the camera, say from center to center right, or far right center, move the camera so that it is focused on the same thing as your first shot, take the shot&#8230; what happened?<br />
for me, the focusing was worse the further i moved away from the center point. and i am not talking 1cm, i am talking completely and utterly out of focus.</p>
<p>i have sent mine into New Jersey canon repair and am awaiting the results.</p>
<p>I also sent in my 85mm F/1.8 and 50mm F/1.8 to have them tested on my camera so they can see the issue and also test the lenses for focus calibration.</p>
<p>the new focusing system is new, yes and not the same as the old cameras, but its not so advanced that one lens shoudl work 100% fine on, say a 40D and then not work on the 7D. and we are not talking one lense, we are talking atleast 6 lenses that work on one camera but not on the 7D. (for me)</p>
<p>my original 7D was fine until i mounted the 85mm F/1.8 so i fear it may be an issue with the lens that, electronically, might be hurting the camera. so again, another reason why i sent the lenses in with the camera.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The 2009 Coolum Kite Festival by Tim Bonython</title>
		<link>http://www.highdefedition.com/2009/10/the-2009-coolum-kite-festival/comment-page-1/#comment-298</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Bonython</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 12:00:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.highdefedition.com/?p=249#comment-298</guid>
		<description>Great Christian - its cool coming from Vimeo with something that grabs me &amp; next thing I know is the blokes work is a Aussie. Good work buddy.

So having shot this last October (Coolum Kite Festival on the 500D) you were on hold to receive a Canon D7 - why a D7 &amp; not a D5?

Also i SHOOT a lot of surfing - have a look at my vimeo site, i was wondering what settings you set your scene files too for the general out doors shoots, as you shot the Kites show?
My interviews/skin tones do look a little orange.But i do like the contasts in my shots. Regards Tim.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great Christian &#8211; its cool coming from Vimeo with something that grabs me &amp; next thing I know is the blokes work is a Aussie. Good work buddy.</p>
<p>So having shot this last October (Coolum Kite Festival on the 500D) you were on hold to receive a Canon D7 &#8211; why a D7 &amp; not a D5?</p>
<p>Also i SHOOT a lot of surfing &#8211; have a look at my vimeo site, i was wondering what settings you set your scene files too for the general out doors shoots, as you shot the Kites show?<br />
My interviews/skin tones do look a little orange.But i do like the contasts in my shots. Regards Tim.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Canon 7D Autofocus Issue by Sean</title>
		<link>http://www.highdefedition.com/2009/10/canon-7d-autofocus-issue/comment-page-1/#comment-297</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2010 17:11:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.highdefedition.com/?p=268#comment-297</guid>
		<description>Director Bob... I have tested my 7D extensively now for 2 months and found what alot of people are saying to be true, which is...  the 7D sensor size, in addition to the pixel density (very high) actually magnify flaws in a shot whether it be a less than stellar lens or movement on the photographers end when taking the shot. For this reason unless the shot is taken under optimal conditions, a 100% view will mostly likely be disappointing to view. Handheld shots requires a higher shutter speed because movement on the photographers end is magnified by the nature of the 7D sensor.  A tripod mounted slower exposure shot that you could take without mirror lockup on another body would require mirror lock up on the 7D or a faster shutter speed.

If you want to test this use a medium range lens unstabalized at a shutter speed you would normally find as acceptable but near borderline for a handheld shot. You will probably find that 7d will not produce a good result. Take that same shot tripod mounted and compare 100% crops.

Go out and shoot a day and try to shoot under increased shutter speed conditions. I think you find that shutter speeds that were acceptable for handheld on other bodies are not the same for the 7D.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Director Bob&#8230; I have tested my 7D extensively now for 2 months and found what alot of people are saying to be true, which is&#8230;  the 7D sensor size, in addition to the pixel density (very high) actually magnify flaws in a shot whether it be a less than stellar lens or movement on the photographers end when taking the shot. For this reason unless the shot is taken under optimal conditions, a 100% view will mostly likely be disappointing to view. Handheld shots requires a higher shutter speed because movement on the photographers end is magnified by the nature of the 7D sensor.  A tripod mounted slower exposure shot that you could take without mirror lockup on another body would require mirror lock up on the 7D or a faster shutter speed.</p>
<p>If you want to test this use a medium range lens unstabalized at a shutter speed you would normally find as acceptable but near borderline for a handheld shot. You will probably find that 7d will not produce a good result. Take that same shot tripod mounted and compare 100% crops.</p>
<p>Go out and shoot a day and try to shoot under increased shutter speed conditions. I think you find that shutter speeds that were acceptable for handheld on other bodies are not the same for the 7D.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Canon 7D Autofocus Issue by MID Ray</title>
		<link>http://www.highdefedition.com/2009/10/canon-7d-autofocus-issue/comment-page-1/#comment-296</link>
		<dc:creator>MID Ray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 09:31:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.highdefedition.com/?p=268#comment-296</guid>
		<description>I was frankly considering a 7D for my first D-SLR, I own the glorious Nikon F3 and the later Canon EOS 300 film SLR&#039;s , which are both great, part of me is a videographer (no clients except myself), and seeing that 7D has 1080p with mildly acceptable compression I was gonna give it a go, especially the idea of shooting film with SLR lenses.
I think I&#039;ll have to check and see if (in the Canon arena) the 5D mark 2 could do better
I have time on me though so if an eventual 5D mark 3 is to appear then I can wait, in here(Lebanon) a 7D without a lens in 2600 US$ not to mention most probable poor warranty service, specially that there is 1 provider only, so it&#039;s a no-go if such problems are to appear out of the box, as far as canon lenses are concerned, I already have a 50mm f1.2 L series, a recently bought 100-400 f4.5 L series as well, and a 24-104 f4, with the upcoming camera, whatever it is gonna be, a 16-35 will make it&#039;s way through as well, L series, and possibly a macro lens 100 , it would be a shame to see this arsenal of good lenses not working properly with the alleged 7D.
video put aside I don&#039;t think 18 Megapixel are a lot, after all the studio where I work recently acquired a Hasselblad H4D which kicks serious ass so as to put it, this sucker is nuclear Megapixel-wise, of course it&#039;s medium format AND truly HI-end so no comparison, but still ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was frankly considering a 7D for my first D-SLR, I own the glorious Nikon F3 and the later Canon EOS 300 film SLR&#8217;s , which are both great, part of me is a videographer (no clients except myself), and seeing that 7D has 1080p with mildly acceptable compression I was gonna give it a go, especially the idea of shooting film with SLR lenses.<br />
I think I&#8217;ll have to check and see if (in the Canon arena) the 5D mark 2 could do better<br />
I have time on me though so if an eventual 5D mark 3 is to appear then I can wait, in here(Lebanon) a 7D without a lens in 2600 US$ not to mention most probable poor warranty service, specially that there is 1 provider only, so it&#8217;s a no-go if such problems are to appear out of the box, as far as canon lenses are concerned, I already have a 50mm f1.2 L series, a recently bought 100-400 f4.5 L series as well, and a 24-104 f4, with the upcoming camera, whatever it is gonna be, a 16-35 will make it&#8217;s way through as well, L series, and possibly a macro lens 100 , it would be a shame to see this arsenal of good lenses not working properly with the alleged 7D.<br />
video put aside I don&#8217;t think 18 Megapixel are a lot, after all the studio where I work recently acquired a Hasselblad H4D which kicks serious ass so as to put it, this sucker is nuclear Megapixel-wise, of course it&#8217;s medium format AND truly HI-end so no comparison, but still &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Canon 7D Autofocus Issue by Director Bob</title>
		<link>http://www.highdefedition.com/2009/10/canon-7d-autofocus-issue/comment-page-1/#comment-295</link>
		<dc:creator>Director Bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Feb 2010 04:23:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.highdefedition.com/?p=268#comment-295</guid>
		<description>After a lifetime of using Nikon gear, I made a total switch to Canon with the 7D.  Sadly, I am having the same focus problems as many other people; 1)AF works about 1 out of every 3-4 shots and 2)the images that ARE properly focused appear fuzzy when viewed at 100% on my computer.  I&#039;ve done the recommended tests but, frankly, should getting a sharp image from any camera really require extensive testing and adjustments?  I had a Nikon D300 previous to the Canon and never had these issues.  Simply put, the Canon 7D is the first camera I&#039;ve owned that I couldn&#039;t just unpack, switch to &quot;Program&quot; mode, and get a sharp picture right out of the box.  What is nearly as disconcerting as having a camera that is fighting me, are the many posts from people on forums who seem to think all the reported focus issues are just &quot;idiots&quot; who don&#039;t know what they are doing.  It&#039;s amazing that for 25 years THIS &quot;idiot&quot; has managed to capture sharp pictures until I got the 7D.  I am completely frustrated.  If anyone has a constructive comment on how they solved the focus issue on their Canon 7D, please share it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After a lifetime of using Nikon gear, I made a total switch to Canon with the 7D.  Sadly, I am having the same focus problems as many other people; 1)AF works about 1 out of every 3-4 shots and 2)the images that ARE properly focused appear fuzzy when viewed at 100% on my computer.  I&#8217;ve done the recommended tests but, frankly, should getting a sharp image from any camera really require extensive testing and adjustments?  I had a Nikon D300 previous to the Canon and never had these issues.  Simply put, the Canon 7D is the first camera I&#8217;ve owned that I couldn&#8217;t just unpack, switch to &#8220;Program&#8221; mode, and get a sharp picture right out of the box.  What is nearly as disconcerting as having a camera that is fighting me, are the many posts from people on forums who seem to think all the reported focus issues are just &#8220;idiots&#8221; who don&#8217;t know what they are doing.  It&#8217;s amazing that for 25 years THIS &#8220;idiot&#8221; has managed to capture sharp pictures until I got the 7D.  I am completely frustrated.  If anyone has a constructive comment on how they solved the focus issue on their Canon 7D, please share it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The new Canon 550D &#8211; What does it all mean Basil? by Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.highdefedition.com/2010/02/the-new-canon-550d-what-does-it-all-mean-basil/comment-page-1/#comment-294</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2010 07:23:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.highdefedition.com/?p=411#comment-294</guid>
		<description>Saving now, I gather that the extra digic is stills only as you say. Can you explain more how the white balance preset works? Is it just 3 types (3200 5600 7000)? And what sort of lenses do you prefer for video on the crop sensor? I didnt realise that the 1.6 factor was so big a zoom. Good luck getting rid of the 500, I was at Teds the other day and the sales rep was resigned to NOT selling me a 500.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Saving now, I gather that the extra digic is stills only as you say. Can you explain more how the white balance preset works? Is it just 3 types (3200 5600 7000)? And what sort of lenses do you prefer for video on the crop sensor? I didnt realise that the 1.6 factor was so big a zoom. Good luck getting rid of the 500, I was at Teds the other day and the sales rep was resigned to NOT selling me a 500.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
